von Neumann-Morgenstern utility theorem

Theorem

If player ii's preference relation i\succsim_i over the set of compound lotteries ̂\hat{\mathcal{L}} is complete and transitive, and satisfies the four , then this preference relation can be represented by a linear utility function.

von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms

Assume i\succsim_i defined over the set of compound lotteries ̂\hat{\mathcal{L}}. Player ii's utility function, representing his preference relation i\succsim_i, is therefore a function ui:̂u_i : \hat{\mathcal{L}} \to \mathbb{R} satisfying ui(L̂1)ui(L̂2)L̂1iL̂2,L̂1,L̂2̂u_i(\hat{L}_1) \geq u_i(\hat{L}_2) \iff \hat{L}_1 \succsim_i \hat{L}_2, \quad \forall \hat{L}_1, \hat{L}_2 \in \hat{\mathcal{L}}

Axiom of Continuity

For every triplet of outcomes AiBiCA \succsim_i B \succsim_i C, there exists a number θi[0,1]\theta_i \in [0,1] such that Bi[θi(A),(1θi)(C)]B \approx_i [\theta_i(A), (1-\theta_i)(C)] (where i\approx_i denotes an indifference relation)

Axiom of Monotonicity

Let α,β\alpha, \beta be numbers in [0,1][0,1], and suppose that AiBA \succ_i B (strict preference). Then, [α(A),(1α)(B)]i[β(A),(1β)(B)][\alpha(A) , (1-\alpha)(B)] \succsim_i [\beta(A) , (1-\beta)(B)] if and only iff αβ\alpha \geq \beta.

Theorem

If a preference relation satisfies the Axioms of and , and if AiBiCA \succsim_i B \succsim_i C, and AiCA \succ_i C, then the value of θi\theta_i defined in the Axiom of Continuity is unique.

Corollary

If a preference relation i\succsim_i over ̂\hat{\mathcal{L}} satisfies the Axioms of Continuity and Monotonicity, and if AKiA1A_K \succ_i A_1, then for each k=1,2,...,Kk = 1,2,...,K there exists a unique θik[0,1]\theta_i^k \in [0,1] such that Aki[θik(AK),(1θik)(A1)]A_k \approx_i [\theta_i^k (A_K), (1-\theta_i^k)(A_1)] The corollary and the fact that A1i[0(AK),1(A1)]A_1 \approx_i [0 (A_K), 1(A_1)] and Aki[1(AK),0(A1)]A_k \approx_i [1 (A_K), 0(A_1)] imply that θi1=0,θiK=1\theta_i^1 = 0, \quad \theta_i^K = 1

Axiom of Simplification of Compound Lotteries

For each j=1,...,Jj = 1,...,J, let LjL_j be the simple lottery Lj=[p1j(A1),p2j(A2),...,pKj(AK)]L_j=[p_1^j (A_1), p_2^j (A_2),...,p_K^j (A_K)] and let L̂\hat L be the compound lottery L̂=[q1(L1),q2(L1),...,qJ(LJ)]\hat L = [q_1(L_1), q_2(L_1), ..., q_J(L_J)] For each k=1,...,Kk=1,...,K, define the overall probability that the outcome of L̂\hat L will be AkA_k, rk=q1pk1+q2pk2+...+qJpkJr_k = q_1 p_k^1 + q_2 p_k^2 + ... + q_J p_k^J Consider simple lottery L=[r1(A1),r2(A2),...,rK(AK)]L = [r_1(A_1),r_2(A_2),...,r_K(A_K)] Then, L̂iL\hat L \approx_i L

Axiom of Independence

Let L̂=[q1(L1),q2(L1),...,qJ(LJ)]\hat L = [q_1(L_1), q_2(L_1), ..., q_J(L_J)] be a compound lottery, and let MM be a simple lottery. If LjiML_j \approx_i M then L̂i[q1(L1),...,qj1(Lj),qj(M),qj+1(Lj+1),...,qJ(LJ)]\hat L \approx_i [q_1(L_1),...,q_{j-1}(L_j),q_j(M),q_{j+1}(L_{j+1}),...,q_J(L_J)]

Notes

Can extend Axioms of Simplification and Independence to compound lotteries of any order. By induction over levels of compounding, it follows that the player's preference relation over all compound lotteries (of any order) is determined by the player's preference relation over simple lotteries.


References

  1. M. Maschler, E. Solan, and Shmuel Zamir, Game Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 14-17.
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann%E2%80%93Morgenstern_utility_theorem#The_theorem
  3. Neumann, John von and Morgenstern, Oskar, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press, 1953.